Description
Bloomsbury Publishing PLC Answering for Crime: Responsibility and Liability in the Criminal Law by Antony Duff
This is the paperback edition of Antony Duffs acclaimed new work on the structures of criminal law and criminal liability. His starting point is a distinction between responsibility (understood as answerability) and liability and a conception of responsibility as relational and practice-based. This focus on responsibility as a matter of being answerable to those who have the standing to call one to account throws new light on a range of questions in criminal law theory: on the question of criminalisation which can now be cast as the question of what we should have to answer for and to whom under the threat of criminal conviction and punishment; on questions about the criminal trial as a process through which defendants are called to answer and about the conditions (bars to trial) given which a trial would be illegitimate; on questions about the structure of offences the distinction between offences and defences and the phenomena of strict liability and strict responsibility; and on questions about the structures of criminal defences.The net result is not a theory of criminal law; but it is an account of the structure of criminal law as an institution through which a liberal polity defines a realm of public wrongdoing and calls those who perpetrate (or are accused of perpetrating) such wrongs to account. For a criminal law theorist this book is simply a must read. Duffs sweeping coverage of criminal law-ranging from the act requirement to justifications and excuses-offers a structural edifice that is indispensible. Though one may not always agree with Duff his original analysis and complex rethinking provides significant insights into the most central questions within criminal law theory. One cannot help but learn from Duff. And anyone who wishes to be taken seriously in criminal law theory will have to grapple with his arguments. Kimberley Kessler Ferzan Criminal Justice Ethics 2009 Philosophers who specialize in normative inquiries but find the time to read only one book in criminal theory every few years should immediately place Answering for Crime at the very top of their pile.It is the best book to have appeared in the philosophy of criminal law in the last decade and the finest book ever to have focused on the structure of criminal responsibility. Answering for Crime cements Antony Duffs reputation as one of the two most important philosophers of criminal law living in the Anglo-American world today.Answering for Crime is an exceedingly original work of legal philosophy written in a refreshingly accessible style.I believe that any future work on the structure of criminal responsibility and liability must begin with Duffs work. No existing book in the philosophy of criminal law can rival the breadth scope and sophistication contained in Duffs analysis. I admire Answering for Crime deeply and recommend it strongly not only to criminal theorists but also to all philosophers interested in how criminal theory sheds light on normative inquiry generally. Douglas Husak Law and Philosophy 2009 .the book is an ambitious one and has implications for almost every aspect of criminal law theory.As was to be expected from one of the most philosophically sophisticated yet institutionally sensitive writers in the field of criminal law theory Answering for Crime is a rich book that makes a very substantial contribution to the discipline.The argument is complex and particularly in the early chapters does not always make for easy reading; but the conception is clear elegant and fully worked through. Nicola Lacey New Criminal Law Review 2009 It covers so many important issues with such clarity and rigour that one review cannot possibly do it justice.What Duff says about crimes but also his views about a whole range of other issues are deeply thought out and important.Duffs book does more to articulate a clear and structured view of criminal responsibility than has been achieved to date and his account of criminal responsibility and liability as well as of the central doctrines and practices of criminal responsibility will have lasting significance for criminal lawyers and philosophers alike. Victor Tadros Mind 2009show more