×







We sell 100% Genuine & New Books only!

Rethinking the BSE Crisis A Study of Scientific Reasoning under Uncertainty 1st Editon 2010 Hardbound at Meripustak

Rethinking the BSE Crisis A Study of Scientific Reasoning under Uncertainty 1st Editon 2010 Hardbound by Louise Cummings, Springer

Books from same Author: Louise Cummings

Books from same Publisher: Springer

Related Category: Author List / Publisher List


  • Price: ₹ 18985.00/- [ 15.00% off ]

    Seller Price: ₹ 16137.00

Estimated Delivery Time : 4-5 Business Days

Sold By: Meripustak      Click for Bulk Order

Free Shipping (for orders above ₹ 499) *T&C apply.

In Stock

We deliver across all postal codes in India

Orders Outside India


Add To Cart


Outside India Order Estimated Delivery Time
7-10 Business Days


  • We Deliver Across 100+ Countries

  • MeriPustak’s Books are 100% New & Original
  • General Information  
    Author(s)Louise Cummings
    PublisherSpringer
    Edition1st Edition
    ISBN9789048195039
    Pages242
    BindingHardbound
    LanguageEnglish
    Publish YearAugust 2010

    Description

    Springer Rethinking the BSE Crisis A Study of Scientific Reasoning under Uncertainty 1st Editon 2010 Hardbound by Louise Cummings

    In 1986, the emergence of a novel brain disease in British cattle presented a unique challenge to scientists. How that challenge was addressed has been the subject of a public inquiry and numerous academic studies conducted to date. However, none of these investigations has sought to examine the reasoning of scientists during this critical period in the public health of the UK. Using concepts and techniques in informal logic, argumentation and fallacy theory, this study reconstructs and evaluates the reasoning of scientists in the ten-year period between 1986 and 1996. Specifically, a form of presumptive reasoning is described in which extensive use is made of arguments traditionally identified as informal fallacies. In the context of the adverse epistemic conditions that confronted scientists during the BSE epidemic, these arguments were anything but fallacious, serving instead to confer a number of epistemic gains upon scientific inquiry.This book argues for a closer integration of philosophy with public health science, an integration that is exemplified by the case of scientific reasoning during the BSE affair. It will therefore be of interest to advanced students, academics, researchers and professionals in the areas of public health science and epidemiology, as well as philosophical disciplines such as informal logic, argumentation and fallacy theory and epistemology. Acknowledgements.- Preface.- 1. BSE – A LEAP INTO THE UNKNOWN.- 1.1 Introduction.- 1.2 Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathies.- 1.3 The BSE Knowledge Problem.- Notes.- 2 THE SCIENTIFIC CHALLENGE.- 2.1 Introduction.- 2.2 The Current Paradigm in Epidemiology.- 2.3 Early Epidemiological Investigations.- Notes.- 3 ARGUING THROUGH UNCERTAINTY.- 3.1 Introduction.- 3.2 Presumption and Science.- 3.3 Presumption and Uncertainty Management.- 3.4 Presumption, Reasoning and Fallacies.- Notes.- 4 GOOD ARGUMENTS DURING THE BSE INQUIRY.- 4.1 Introduction.- 4.2 The Early Years: 1986 to 1989.- 4.3 Summary.- Notes.- 5 THE UNRAVELLING OF AN ARGUMENTATIVE STRATEGY.- 5.1 Introduction.- 5.2 The Middle Years: 1989 to 1994.- 5.3 Summary.- Notes.- 6 AN UNCHALLENGEABLE SCIENTIFIC CONSENSUS.- 6.1 Introduction.- 6.2 The Final Years: 1994-1996.- 6.3 Summary.- Notes.- 7 POLITICAL AND COMMERCIAL INTERESTS IN THE BSE INQUIRY.- 7.1 Introduction.-7.2 Reasoning and Non-Scientific Interests in the BSE Inquiry.- 7.3 Summary.- Notes.- 8 LEARNING THE LESSONS OF THE BSE CRISIS.- 8.1 Introduction.- 8.2 A Model of Reasoning in Scientific Inquiry.- 8.3 The Model, Risk Analysis and Public Health Science.- 8.4 Summary.- Notes.- Bibliography.- Index.



    Book Successfully Added To Your Cart